x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Statistics in Oncology Series
- BiasRemove Bias filter
- Meta-analysisRemove Meta-analysis filter
- Journal of Thoracic OncologyRemove Journal of Thoracic Oncology filter
Statistics in Oncology Series
1 Results
- Biostatistics for CliniciansOpen Archive
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis of Published Studies: An Overview and Best Practices
Journal of Thoracic OncologyVol. 6Issue 8p1301–1303Published in issue: August, 2011- Jayawant N. Mandrekar
- Sumithra J. Mandrekar
Cited in Scopus: 5Systematic reviews and meta-analytic approaches are widely used in the clinical arena to integrate outcome data from published studies in a patient population that address a set of related research hypotheses. The credibility of this line of research is dependent on how the studies are chosen, how the data are assembled, and how the results are reported. In this brief report, we provide an overview of the minimum set of reporting requirements for systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.