x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Pathology Articles
- Review ArticleRemove Review Article filter
- Brambilla, ElisabethRemove Brambilla, Elisabeth filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2015 and 2021.
Author
- Beasley, Mary Beth2
- Dacic, Sanja2
- Kerr, Keith M2
- Nicholson, Andrew G2
- Noguchi, Masayuki2
- Travis, William D2
- Yatabe, Yasushi2
- Austin, John HM1
- Borczuk, Alain C1
- Chirieac, Lucian R1
- Cooper, Wendy A1
- Duhig, Edwina1
- Flieder, Douglas B1
- Geisinger, Kim1
- Hirsch, Fred R1
- Ishikawa, Yuichi1
- Jain, Deepali1
- Lantuejoul, Sylvie1
- Papotti, Mauro1
- Pelosi, Giuseppe1
- Powell, Charles A1
- Rekhtman, Natasha1
- Scagliotti, Giorgio1
- Sholl, Lynette1
Pathology Articles
2 Results
- State of the Art: Concise Review
The 2021 WHO Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Advances Since 2015
Journal of Thoracic OncologyVol. 17Issue 3p362–387Published online: November 19, 2021- Andrew G. Nicholson
- Ming S. Tsao
- Mary Beth Beasley
- Alain C. Borczuk
- Elisabeth Brambilla
- Wendy A. Cooper
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 118The 2021 WHO Classification of Thoracic Tumours was published earlier this year, with classification of lung tumors being one of the chapters. The principles remain those of using morphology first, supported by immunohistochemistry, and then molecular techniques. In 2015, there was particular emphasis on using immunohistochemistry to make classification more accurate. In 2021, there is greater emphasis throughout the book on advances in molecular pathology across all tumor types. Major features within this edition are (1) broader emphasis on genetic testing than in the 2015 WHO Classification; (2) a section entirely dedicated to the classification of small diagnostic samples; (3) continued recommendation to document percentages of histologic patterns in invasive nonmucinous adenocarcinomas, with utilization of these features to apply a formal grading system, and using only invasive size for T-factor size determination in part lepidic nonmucinous lung adenocarcinomas as recommended by the eighth edition TNM classification; (4) recognition of spread through airspaces as a histologic feature with prognostic significance; (5) moving lymphoepithelial carcinoma to squamous cell carcinomas; (6) update on evolving concepts in lung neuroendocrine neoplasm classification; (7) recognition of bronchiolar adenoma/ciliated muconodular papillary tumor as a new entity within the adenoma subgroup; (8) recognition of thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor; and (9) inclusion of essential and desirable diagnostic criteria for each tumor. - State of the Art: Concise ReviewOpen Archive
The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Genetic, Clinical and Radiologic Advances Since the 2004 Classification
Journal of Thoracic OncologyVol. 10Issue 9p1243–1260Published in issue: September, 2015- William D. Travis
- Elisabeth Brambilla
- Andrew G. Nicholson
- Yasushi Yatabe
- John H.M. Austin
- Mary Beth Beasley
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 2549The 2015 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart has just been published with numerous important changes from the 2004 WHO classification. The most significant changes in this edition involve (1) use of immunohistochemistry throughout the classification, (2) a new emphasis on genetic studies, in particular, integration of molecular testing to help personalize treatment strategies for advanced lung cancer patients, (3) a new classification for small biopsies and cytology similar to that proposed in the 2011 Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification, (4) a completely different approach to lung adenocarcinoma as proposed by the 2011 Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification, (5) restricting the diagnosis of large cell carcinoma only to resected tumors that lack any clear morphologic or immunohistochemical differentiation with reclassification of the remaining former large cell carcinoma subtypes into different categories, (6) reclassifying squamous cell carcinomas into keratinizing, nonkeratinizing, and basaloid subtypes with the nonkeratinizing tumors requiring immunohistochemistry proof of squamous differentiation, (7) grouping of neuroendocrine tumors together in one category, (8) adding NUT carcinoma, (9) changing the term sclerosing hemangioma to sclerosing pneumocytoma, (10) changing the name hamartoma to “pulmonary hamartoma,” (11) creating a group of PEComatous tumors that include (a) lymphangioleiomyomatosis, (b) PEComa, benign (with clear cell tumor as a variant) and (c) PEComa, malignant, (12) introducing the entity pulmonary myxoid sarcoma with an EWSR1–CREB1 translocation, (13) adding the entities myoepithelioma and myoepithelial carcinomas, which can show EWSR1 gene rearrangements, (14) recognition of usefulness of WWTR1–CAMTA1 fusions in diagnosis of epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas, (15) adding Erdheim–Chester disease to the lymphoproliferative tumor, and (16) a group of tumors of ectopic origin to include germ cell tumors, intrapulmonary thymoma, melanoma and meningioma.