x
Filter:
Filters applied
- JTO: Editors Choice
- Chung, Jin-HaengRemove Chung, Jin-Haeng filter
- Geisinger, Kim RRemove Geisinger, Kim R filter
- Borczuk, Alain CRemove Borczuk, Alain C filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2018 and 2018.
Author
- Beasley, Mary Beth1
- Bolting, Johan1
- Bubendorf, Lukas1
- Chen, Gang1
- Chirieac, Lucian R1
- Chou, Teh-Ying1
- Dacic, Sanja1
- Hirsch, Fred R1
- Kerr, Keith M1
- Lantuejoul, Sylvie1
- Lopez-Rios, Fernando1
- Mino-Kenudson, Mari1
- Moreira, Andre L1
- Nicholson, Andrew G1
- Noguchi, Masayuki1
- Papotti, Mauro1
- Pelosi, Giuseppe1
- Poleri, Claudia1
- Rekhtman, Natasha1
- Roden, Anja C1
- Russell, Prudence A1
- Sholl, Lynette M1
Editors Choice
1 Results
- Special ArticleOpen Archive
Best Practices Recommendations for Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry in Lung Cancer
Journal of Thoracic OncologyVol. 14Issue 3p377–407Published online: December 17, 2018- Yasushi Yatabe
- Sanja Dacic
- Alain C. Borczuk
- Arne Warth
- Prudence A. Russell
- Sylvie Lantuejoul
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 153Since the 2015 WHO classification was introduced into clinical practice, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has figured prominently in lung cancer diagnosis. In addition to distinction of small cell versus non–small cell carcinoma, patients’ treatment of choice is directly linked to histologic subtypes of non–small cell carcinoma, which pertains to IHC results, particularly for poorly differentiated tumors. The use of IHC has improved diagnostic accuracy in the classification of lung carcinoma, but the interpretation of IHC results remains challenging in some instances.