Advertisement

Plasma Progastrin-Releasing Peptide and Chromogranin A Assays for Diagnosing and Monitoring Lung Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Brief Report

Published:December 08, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2022.11.021

      Abstract

      Introduction

      The use of chromogranin A (CGA) as a circulating biomarker in lung carcinoids (LCs) is limited by low specificity and sensitivity. This study aimed to evaluate plasma progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRPp) as an alternative to plasma CGA (CGAp), for the diagnosis and follow-up of LC.

      Methods

      ProGRPp and CGAp concentrations were measured in 107 patients with LC and 105 patients with benign lung disease (BLD).

      Results

      ProGRPp distinguished patients with LC with active disease in the pretreatment (n = 43) and post-treatment (n = 43) groups from those with BLD: area under the curve for both 0.864 (p < 0.0001); sensitivity 67.4% and 58.1%, respectively; specificity 96.2%; at 64 pg/mL cutoff. CGAp failed to differentiate both LC groups from those with BLD: area under the curve 0.579 and 0.526 (for both p > 0.1); sensitivity 34.9% and 25.6%, respectively; specificity 73.3%; at 104 ng/mL cutoff. Only ProGRPp correlated with the Ki67 proliferation index (r = 0.40, p < 0.001) and was associated with mitotic count (p = 0.025), stage (p = 0.018), grade (p = 0.019), and the expression of thyroid transcription factor-1 (p = 0.005). ProGRPp had a high sensitivity (92.3%) in LC with diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia. Abnormal postoperative ProGRPp level was associated with residual disease (p = 0.029). The changes in ProGRPp level during treatment, a decrease greater than 30% and an increase greater than 8%, were associated with image-based outcomes, partial response and disease progression, respectively (p < 0.0001). CGAp did not reflect the disease course.

      Conclusions

      ProGRPp was superior to CGAp in diagnosing LC with correlations concerning proliferation, grading, staging, diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia co-occurrence, and response to treatment. ProGRPp is an optimal emerging biomarker to be further evaluated.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Thoracic Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rekhtman N.
        Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: an update.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010; 134: 1628-1638
        • Nicholson A.G.
        • Tsao M.S.
        • Beasley M.B.
        • et al.
        The 2021 WHO classification of lung tumors: impact of advances since 2015.
        J Thorac Oncol. 2022; 17: 362-387
        • Shah M.H.
        • Goldner W.S.
        • Benson A.B.
        • et al.
        Neuroendocrine and adrenal tumors, version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021; 19: 839-868
        • Malczewska A.
        • Kidd M.
        • Matar S.
        • et al.
        An assessment of circulating chromogranin A as a biomarker of bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Neuroendocrinology. 2020; 110: 198-216
        • Matar S.
        • Malczewska A.
        • Oberg K.
        • et al.
        Blood chromogranin A is not effective as a biomarker for diagnosis or management of bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors/neoplasms.
        Neuroendocrinology. 2020; 110: 185-197
        • Giladi E.
        • Nagalla S.R.
        • Spindel E.R.
        Molecular cloning and characterization of receptors for the mammalian bombesin-like peptides.
        J Mol Neurosci. 1993; 4: 41-54
        • Miyake Y.
        • Kodama T.
        • Yamaguchi K.
        Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (31–98) is a specific tumor marker in patients with small cell lung carcinoma.
        Cancer Res. 1994; 54: 2136-2140
        • Schnabel P.A.
        • Junker K.
        Pulmonale neuroendokrine Tumoren in der neuen WHO-Klassifikation 2015: Beginn eines Aufbruchs zu "neuen Ufern"? [Pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors in the new WHO 2015 classification: start of breaking new grounds?].
        Pathologe. 2015; 36: 283-292
        • Armitage P.
        Statistical Methods in Medical Research.
        Blackwell, Oxford, United Kingdom1971
        • Nisman B.
        • Nechushtan H.
        • Biran H.
        • et al.
        New ARCHITECT plasma pro-gastrin-releasing peptide assay for diagnosing and monitoring small-cell lung cancer.
        Br J Cancer. 2016; 114: 469-476
        • Cisbio
        CGA ELISA Cisbio Bioassays Package Insert.
        (Accessed December 22, 2022)
        • Filosso P.L.
        • Rena O.
        • Donati G.
        • et al.
        Bronchial carcinoid tumors: surgical management and long-term outcome.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002; 123: 303-309
        • Weissferdt A.
        • Tang X.
        • Wistuba II,
        • Moran C.A.
        Comparative immunohistochemical analysis of pulmonary and thymic neuroendocrine carcinomas using PAX8 and TTF-1.
        Mod Pathol. 2013; 26: 1554-1560
        • Korse C.M.
        • Taal B.G.
        • Bonfrer J.M.G.
        • Vincent A.
        • van Velthuysen M.L.
        • Baas P.
        An elevated progastrin-releasing peptide level in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours indicates a primary tumour in the lung and predicts a shorter survival.
        Ann Oncol. 2011; 22: 2625-2630
        • Degan S.
        • Lopez G.Y.
        • Kevill K.
        • Sunday M.E.
        Gastrin-releasing peptide, immune responses, and lung disease.
        Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008; 1144: 136-147