If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
We present two cases of metastatic pleural mesothelioma with spread in one case to the esophagus and in the other to celiac nodes, in which positron emission tomography (PET) aided treatment decisions, and in which endoscopic ultrasound was the source of tissue for histologic confirmation of PET findings.
CASE REPORTS
Case 1
A 55-year-old electrician, smoker, presented with breathlessness and dysphagia. He was found to have a pleural effusion on chest radiograph, and underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. This revealed pleural deposits, which were biopsied and showed malignant mesothelioma of epithelioid subtype. He had a talc pleurodesis performed. In view of the dysphagia, he had an esophagastroscopy, with no obvious abnormality found. Because of consideration for extrapleural pneumonectomy surgery, in the context of the national MARS trial,
a positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography scan was performed, which demonstrated intense uptake in the left pleura, and less intense uptake in the posterior mediastinum in the region of the esophagus (Figure 1). He then underwent a mediastinoscopy, which found malignant mesothelioma in a mediastinal lymph node, and nondiagnostic tissue from the subcarinal mass. His dysphagia continued, and the subcarinal mass dramatically increased in size (Figure 2). He therefore underwent a further endoscopy with endoscopic ultrasound. A stenosis of the esophagus was seen at 30 cm with edematous mucosa, and under endoscopic ultrasound a circumferential mass between 28 and 40 cm was observed, with a maximal thickness of 23 mm. Biopsies of the esophageal wall confirmed malignant mesothelioma. Over the next few weeks, the dysphagia increased, leading to esophageal stent insertion (Figure 3) with symptomatic improvement.
FIGURE 1Case 1: Initial positron emission tomography (PET) showing uptake in region of esophagus (large arrow), and in pleural cavity (small arrows).
A 60-year-old nonsmoking man, with no obvious history of exposure to asbestos, presented with malaise, dyspnea, and weight loss. Chest radiograph demonstrated a left sided pleural effusion. A video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery pleurodesis was performed, and biopsies of pleural deposits demonstrated mesothelioma of mixed epithelioid and sarcomatoid histology. Staging computed tomography showed circumferential thickening over the left hemidiaphragm and mediastinum. There was no significant central lymphadenopathy, and no evidence of disease outside the left hemithorax. He had port site radiotherapy, then received six cycles of three- weekly chemotherapy with cisplatin [75 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) day 1] and pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 IV day 1) with stable disease as best objective response. He was subsequently considered for extrapleural pneumonectomy, and had a PET scan, which demonstrated fluoro-deoxy glucose (FDG) uptake in the left hemithorax, no uptake in the mediastinum, but an unexpected intense focus of uptake (standard uptake value 4) in celiac nodes (Figure 4). On review, the patient had developed epigastric pain, and had undergone a diagnostic esophagogastroscopy, which demonstrated no abnormalities. An endoscopic upper gastrointestinal ultrasound was performed, and enlarged celiac nodes with abnormal ultrasonographic morphology were noted. Fine-needle aspiration of one of the enlarged nodes confirmed metastatic mesothelioma. Extrapleural pneumonectomy was therefore not considered feasible. A subsequent PET scan performed before consideration of palliative decortication demonstrated significant progression both of the primary disease and locoregional and celiac axis nodes.
FIGURE 4Case 2: positron emission tomography (PET) scan after four cycles chemotherapy showing celiac node (white arrow).
There are no cases reported that describe infiltration of the esophageal wall by a secondary mesothelioma metastasis to the degree observed in the first patient described. In comparison, spread to the celiac nodal group is recognized but unusual, and is thought to be due to nodal drainage patterns from the diaphragm to this region.
Mesothelioma is difficult to stage accurately. There is a developing body of literature to suggest a role for PET in mesothelioma management. At initial diagnosis, studies investigating the role of PET in staging reported sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 100%, and in staging, PET can increase accuracy by identifying involved nodal disease, and occult metastases.
Our cases illustrate the use of PET in staging and in identifying unusual sites of disease and nodal spread. Although mediastinoscopy can play an important role in staging before consideration of radical surgery, especially if mediastinal nodes seem involved, it would not have been helpful in case 2 where mediastinal nodes were not detected on PET scan.
PET is a relatively nonspecific modality, and biopsy of areas which demonstrate uptake are mandated if (a) there is doubt about involvement by cancer, and (b) if knowledge of this will mean a significant change of management. In both of these reported cases, the confirmation of cancer spread to the sites involved was important. Biopsy was performed in both cases by endoscopic ultrasound. This intervention examines local structures, in particular mediastinal nodes, thickened areas of hollow viscera through which the endoscope passes, and in the abdomen, the celiac nodes. The role of endoscopic ultrasound in staging the mediastinum in non-small cell lung cancer is well established. Compared with mediastinoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound allows better access to the posterior mediastinum, including subcarinal, inferior mediastinal, and aortopulmonary window nodes.
These cases demonstrate that (1) mesothelioma can metastasize in an unusual and unpredictable manner and other clinically relevant regions—the esophagus or celiac axis nodes—can be involved, (2) PET and endoscopic ultrasound are useful as staging tools in this malignancy.